<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>K Street Cafe &#187; chris battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kstreetcafe.com/tag/chris-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kstreetcafe.com</link>
	<description>News from the New K Street</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Hill: Why Washington doesn’t get new media </title>
		<link>http://www.kstreetcafe.com/the-hill-why-washington-doesn%e2%80%99t-get-new-media%e2%80%a8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kstreetcafe.com/the-hill-why-washington-doesn%e2%80%99t-get-new-media%e2%80%a8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>K Street Cafe Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kstreetcafe.com/?p=950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adfero Group&#8217;s Chris Battle recently wrote an article titled, &#8220;Why Washington doesn’t get new media ,&#8221; which was published in The Hill.  Check out an excerpt from the piece below, or read the full article here.
When I first started working in Washington, in the ’90s, websites were still a novelty — a bad novelty. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adfero Group&#8217;s Chris Battle recently wrote an article titled, &#8220;Why Washington doesn’t get new media<strong> </strong>,&#8221; which was published in The Hill.  Check out an excerpt from the piece below, or read the full article <a href="http://thehill.com/k-street-insiders/why-washington-doesnt-get-new-media-2009-05-19.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>When I first started working in Washington, in the ’90s, websites were still a novelty — a bad novelty. The average congressional website was little more than an electronic pamphlet featuring the face of a member of Congress smiling out like a trial attorney airbrushed onto an interstate billboard.<br />
<span id="more-950"></span><br />
The federal agencies were even worse. Agency officials saw the Internet as a piece of technology, not a communications tool.</p>
<p>Website management was relegated to IT staff rather than to communications shops.</p>
<p>Things eventually improved, but despite the stunning advances in communications technology, most of federal Washington has still failed to grasp the meaning of Government 2.0. Indeed, much is mired in Government 1.5.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kstreetcafe.com/the-hill-why-washington-doesn%e2%80%99t-get-new-media%e2%80%a8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

